Bal olympique. Vrai bal sportif costumé
Programme for the costumed sports ball of the Union des Artistes Russes à Paris at the Taverne de l’Olympia, Friday 11 July 1924, staged alongside the Paris Games. The richly illustrated booklet comprises [12] pages with a cover by Victor Barthe; inside are contributions by Picasso, Marie Vassilieff, S. Fotinsky, N. Granovsky and Chatzman, with a nod to Manet’s *Olympia*. It distills the émigré energy of Montparnasse, fusing festivity with avant-garde graphics. Large oblong format; typographic work by François Bernouard on vélin Normandy. A finely preserved piece of ephemera uniting sport, art and spectacle. For bibliophiles, a rare hinge between dance programme, artist’s print culture, and Olympic memorabilia.
Quantity
Paris, Union des Artistes Russes à
Picasso, Pablo
Bal olympique. Vrai bal sportif costumé
1924 | Paris | Union des Artistes Russes à Paris
An elegant Olympic ephemeron that bottles the fizz of 1924. Very well preserved, visually sparkling.
Programme for the costumed sports ball of the Union des Artistes Russes à Paris at the Taverne de l’Olympia, Friday 11 July 1924, staged alongside the Paris Games. The richly illustrated booklet comprises [12] pages with a cover by Victor Barthe; inside are contributions by Picasso, Marie Vassilieff, S. Fotinsky, N. Granovsky and Chatzman, with a nod to Manet’s *Olympia*. It distills the émigré energy of Montparnasse, fusing festivity with avant-garde graphics. Large oblong format; typographic work by François Bernouard on vélin Normandy. A finely preserved piece of ephemera uniting sport, art and spectacle. For bibliophiles, a rare hinge between dance programme, artist’s print culture, and Olympic memorabilia.
€850
Condition Report:
In-Depth Study
References & Bibliography
Format
In-4 (Quarto) approx. 25 × 32 cm
Edition Particulars
Very good condition; richly illustrated; size c. 24.8 × 28.9 cm.
Paper
vélin Normandy
1
Edition Particulars:
We welcome private inquiries, collaborations with institutions, and acquisition requests. Each message is treated with discretion and respect. We welcome private inquiries, collaborations with institutions, and acquisition requests.
1
Print Run:
Condition Report:
1
Copy Number:
Condition Report:
1
Paper:
Condition Report:
1
Signed:
Condition Report:
Product DETAIL
The contents blend practical programme notes with autonomous imagery: poster-like vignettes, pastiche, and an explicit nod to Picasso’s *Mercure* universe. Trade and bibliographic notes report an original Picasso lithograph, *Mercure: Étude de danseur*, made only for this programme after a pencil design. Other contributions range from caricature to modern typography, so the booklet reads like a miniature exhibition. The oblong page encourages dynamic pacing. This copy is in “very good condition.”

Deineka, A. · Moor, D. · Perelman, V. · Sokolov-Skalya, P.
Russian avant-garde. Бригада художников (Brigada Khudozhnikov). № 2.
This single issue of *Бригада художников* (*Brigada Khudozhnikov*, “Artists’ Brigade”) captures a turning point in Soviet visual culture: one of the last pulses of Constructivist-periodical energy before doctrine tightened. Published in Moscow by OGIZ-IZOGIZ, the journal was short-lived (1931–1932) and survives as a small, finite run of issues. No. 2 (1932) shows artists and designers still deploying the grammar of modernity—hard-edged typography, rhythmic layout, collective voice—under rapidly shifting cultural policy. The involvement of figures such as Aleksandr Deineka and Dmitry Moor gives the issue real documentary weight for the history of graphic art and propaganda imagery. At 63 pages in the original Russian, it reads as both a periodical and a compact artist’s dossier. A scarce, tactile survivor of an ephemeral platform, poised on the threshold between experimental avant-garde practice and the consolidation of Socialist Realism. Condition: good.
Revue
€500

Depero, Fortunato · Boccioni, Umberto
Dinamo futurista, Anno I, nn. 3–4–5
The final, scarce issue of the futurist magazine steered and designed by Fortunato Depero. Issued for the National Tributes to Umberto Boccioni held by the City of Milan, 14–16 June 1933, it differs in format and graphic architecture from earlier numbers and was printed in an enlarged run. The production attains exceptional typographic and visual quality, with crisp Depero layout and photographic plates printed outside the text. Newly assembled, impassioned contributions by Marinetti, Buzzi, Russolo and Notari are interleaved with memorable quotations from Boccioni’s own writings. Two diagrams drawn by Depero articulate a vision of speed, energy and “dinamo” as the motor of modern art. Together with a rich iconographic selection, the issue stands as a simultaneously theoretical and visual homage to the pioneer of Italian Futurism.
Revue
€1,350

José-Maria Sert · Giorgio de Chirico · Matisse, Henri · Picasso, Pablo
Programmes Ballets Russes
Two original program booklets from Serge Diaghilev’s legendary Ballets Russes, featuring contributions by avant-garde artists such as Picasso, Matisse, Sert, and de Chirico. Rare artifacts of interdisciplinary modernism spanning dance, visual art, and typography during the interwar period.
Revue
€450

Marinetti, Filippo Tommaso
La Danse Futuriste. Danse de l’aviateur – Danse du shrapnell – Danse de la mitrailleuse. Manifeste futuriste
La Danse Futuriste is one of the key texts of Italian Futurism in its most direct, militant, and performative form. It is a separately issued French manifesto by Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, founder and tireless propagandist of the movement. Rather than a deluxe book, it is a tract, designed for the rapid circulation of ideas and for immediate impact. That modest physical form is precisely what makes it so faithful to Futurist practice, in which print was used as an instrument of artistic intervention. The text transfers the Futurist glorification of speed, violence, and mechanism into the realm of dance, doing so with the aggressive clarity that is so characteristic of Marinetti. As a separate French issue, the pamphlet is bibliographically intriguing, since specialists have catalogued it both as 1917 and as circa 1920. That uncertainty only adds to its interest rather than diminishing its importance. For collectors, this is above all a primary avant-garde document: scarce, fragile, and historically charged.




























